Health Care Litigation

The rapid changes in health care regulation and in the health care market frequently generate disputes and litigation.

Whether health care disputes originate as litigation or as part of our health care practice, our litigation and health care attorneys work together, drawing on their knowledge and experience of the health care industry, health law and regulation, and the state and federal court and/or regulatory system.

The primary objective of our health law strategy is to avoid the financial and personal costs of litigation through application of risk management, proactive compliance, and litigation avoidance strategies.  Yet, when disputes or regulatory matters necessitate litigation, administrative proceedings, arbitration, or other actions, Ruder Ware works with hospitals, clinics, and physician clients to develop effective litigation strategies designed to protect their interests.

Our attorneys frequently provide subject matter expertise and support to other law firms in support of health care litigation.  Additionally, Ruder Ware has a developed network of expert support available as needed in disputes involving “niche” area disputes.

Health care litigation and litigation support services we provide to clients include:

  • Business disputes involving health care providers
  • Health care contract disputes
  • Government certification disputes
  • Ambulatory surgery center investor disputes and exclusions
  • Compliance investigations and support
  • Government investigations
  • Managed care litigation
  • Health care antitrust claims
  • Fraud and abuse matters
  • HIPAA investigations and government inquiries
  • Investigations regarding mental health and SAMHSA records
  • Patient grievance investigations and resolution
  • Medical staff credentialing disputes
  • State license investigations and disputes
  • State and federal administrative hearings
  • Disputes involving software and major system installations
  • Non-compete enforcement and defense
  • Self-disclosure and overpayment defense

Should legal disputes extend beyond Wisconsin, Ruder Ware’s affiliation with Meritas®, an international alliance of law firms, means our network of lawyers can provide counsel for clients anywhere in this country or around the world.

Founded in 1920, Ruder Ware provides business, employment, estate planning, and litigation services through its offices in Wausau, Eau Claire, and Green Bay, Wisconsin.  A full-service law firm, over 40 attorneys provide clients with a one-stop approach to their legal needs. Ruder Ware, Business Attorneys for Business Success.

Proposed Revisions to the SAMHSA Regulations Would Permit Non-Part 2 Providers to Reference Part 2 Treatment in Patient Records

Posted on September 23, 2019 by

Our representation of behavioral health and substance abuse programs has required us to stay in tune to issues involving special confidentiality of patient records under 42 CFR Part 2, also known as the SAMHSA regulations. The SAMHSA regulations were completely recast in two sets of regulatory revisions that were issued in 2017 and 2018. One […]

Congress Creates a Mess by Enacting the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018

Posted on June 13, 2019 by

Congress has activated a new Anti-Kickback law known as Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018 (commonly referred to as EKRA).  The new Anti-Kickback law applies to arrangements involving recovery homes, clinical treatment facilities, and laboratories. Congressional intent for enacting EKRA was noble.  It wanted to clarify that brokering of opioid use disorder patients for […]

Apply the 60-Day Rule to Medicaid Overpayments

Posted on May 30, 2019 by

The Affordable Care Act requires any person who has received an overpayment from certain defined government health programs to report and return the overpayment within 60 days after the overpayment is identified.  If an overpayment is not repaid, or if a self-disclosure is not made before the expiration of the 60-day period, the overpayment amount […]

The Federal Government Really Wants You to Take Self Disclose

Posted on May 28, 2019 by

The Department of Justice (DOJ) along with other health care fraud enforcement agencies, continue to send strong signals that they want businesses to police themselves for potential compliance issues and self-disclose where infractions are found.  The fact of the matter is the government simply does not have enough resources to track down and take action […]

The Essence of Compliance – Compliance Officer Authority and Resource Allocation

Posted on May 24, 2019 by

How Are Compliance Budgeting and Compliance Officer Autonomy Tied Together When Assessing Compliance Effectiveness? The Department of Justice (“DOJ”)’s compliance program evaluation identifies the need to allocate sufficient revenues to the compliance program as one of the key issues that indicates compliance program effectiveness.  The issue of resource allocation has been identified since the early […]

HIPAA this, HIPAA that. Everything is a HIPAA Issue. Deconstructing the “HIPAA Bias.”

Posted on May 21, 2019 by

HIPAA, as a body of regulations protecting the confidentiality of patient health care information, has been branded very effectively.  Most staff at your average health care facility know about HIPAA and that it protects the confidentiality of a patient’s health care information.  They understand they cannot go home and discuss patients they treat and that […]

DOJ’s New Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs – A Good Time to Focus on the Essence of Compliance

Posted on May 20, 2019 by

The Criminal Division of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released an update (April, 2019) to its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (Evaluation).  The Evaluation was first introduced in 2017 to provide guidance for prosecutors to consider when conducting investigations, determining whether to bring charges, and negotiating plea and other agreements.  The Evaluation […]

New CMS Rules for Inpatient Rehabilitation

Posted on May 13, 2019 by

Well, it’s a start.  New Medicare rules kicked in starting January 1, 2019 that are aimed at focusing less provider time on paperwork and more on patient care in inpatient rehabilitation facilities.  Any change that reduces paperwork in this overregulated area is welcome, but the actual impact of the announced changes are incremental at best. […]

CMS Proposes Rule to Ease Compliance Requirements

Posted on October 22, 2018 by

Last month, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced a proposed rule designed to, in CMS’s words, “relieve burden on healthcare providers by removing unnecessary, obsolete or excessively burdensome Medicare compliance requirements for healthcare facilities”.  CMS estimates that the annual savings to healthcare providers would be $1.2 billion. The proposed rule is some […]

OIG Opinion on Donation of Telehealth Equipment

Posted on September 5, 2018 by

A recent Advisory Opinion (Advisory Opinion 18-03) from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services addresses potential kickback issues involved in the donation of telehealth equipment.  The OIG has issued opinions addressing technology donation in the past, but not directly involving telemedicine and not involving services that were […]

More Insights...